Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

For simplification, we consider that the Victim link receiver and the Interefering link transmitter are defined using the following assumptions (1 km distance between the Victim and the Interefering link transmitter). This is illustrated in Figure 134.

Image Removed Image Added

Anchor
F138F134F138
F134
Figure 134: Setting up the distance between the Interfering and the Victim pair of
transmitter and receiver


If the power control is not activated then the iRSSunwanted is (see Figure 135):

...

Mathinline
bodyiRSSunwanted = 33 (dBm) + 11 + 9 - (32.5 + 10 log(1) + 20 log(1000)) = -39.5 dBm
                   

Image Removed Image Added

Anchor
F139F135F139
F135
Figure 135: iRSSunwanted without power control

...

The same assumption is used for the distance between ILT and the ILR (i.e. x = 0 km and y = 1 km) where the ILT is the (0,0) origin as shown in Figure 136.

Image Removed Image Added

Anchor
F140F136F140
F136
Figure 136: Setting up the distance between the Interfering link transmitter and the Interfering link receiver to evaluate the dRSSInterfering link receiver.

...

The power control can be input as shown in Figure 137.


Image Removed Image Added

Anchor
F141F137F141
F137
Figure 137: Setting up the power control for the interfering link

...

Now, if the threshold is decreased from –35 dBm to –50 dBm (see Figure 138)

Image RemovedImage Added

Anchor
F142F138F142
F138
Figure 138: Reduction of the minimum threshold in the PC

...