Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


A.17.20.1 Description of the model

...


This

...

path

...

loss

...

model

...

was

...

developed

...

by

...

ITU-R

...

and

...

its

...

detailed

...

description

...

can

...

be

...

found

...

in

...

[1

...

].

...

  The

...

model

...

was

...

developed

...

for

...

the

...

evaluation

...

of

...

candidate

...

IMT-Advanced

...

Radio

...

Interface

...

Technologies

...

in

...

the

...

frequency

...

band

...

2–6

...

GHz

...

and

...

for

...

the

...

following

...

environments:

...

urban

...

macro

...

(UMa),

...

urban

...

micro

...

(UMi),

...

suburban

...

macro

...

(SMa),

...

rural

...

macro

...

(RMa),

...

and

...

indoor

...

hotspot

...

(InH).

...

Note

...

that

...

only

...

outdoor

...

scenarios

...

UMa,

...

SMa,

...

and

...

RMa

...

are

...

implemented

...

in

...

SEAMCAT.

...

The

...

path

...

loss

...

model

...

from

...

Report

...

ITU-R

...

M.2135-1

...

is

...

an

...

empirical

...

path

...

loss

...

model

...

based

...

on

...

measurements

...

results

...

carried

...

out

...

in

...

IST-WINNER

...

II

...

project

...

[2

...

],

...

as

...

well

...

as

...

results

...

from

...

the

...

literature.

...

The

...

model

...

supports

...

LOS

...

and

...

NLOS

...

propagation

...

conditions

...

as

...

well

...

as

...

the

...

LOS

...

probabilities.

...

This

...

model

...

includes

...

clutter

...

loss

...

and

...

as

...

such,

...

it

...

is

...

not

...

to

...

be

...

combined

...

with

...

the

...

clutter

...

loss

...

model

...

of

...

Recommendation

...

ITU-R

...

P.2108-0.

...

Table 1: ITU-R M.2135-1

...

Path

...

Loss model

Scenario

LOS/NLOS

Path Loss [dB]

Shadow fading std [dB]

Applicability ranges and default values [m]

Urban Macro (UMa)

LOS

PLUMa-LOS= PL1, 10 m≤d≤dBP'PL2, dBP'≤d≤5 km , (see Note 1)

σSF=4

hMS=1.5
hBS=25



PL1=28.0+22log10d+20log10fc





PL2=7.8+40log10d-18.0log10hBS'-18.0log10hMS'+2.0log10fc




NLOS

PLUMa-NLOS=161.04-7.1log10W+7.5log10h-24.37-3.7hhBS2log10hBS+(43.42-3.1log10hBS))log10d-3+20log10 fc-(3.2log1011.75hMS2-4.97)

σSF=6

hBS=25
hMS=1.5
W=20
h=20
10≤d≤5000
10≤hBS≤150
1≤hMS≤10
5≤W≤50
5≤h≤50

Suburban Macro (SMa)

LOS

PLSMa-LOS= PL1, 10 m≤d≤dBP'PL2, dBP'≤d≤5 km , (see Note 2)


hBS=35
hMS=1.5
W=20
h=10
10≤hBS≤150
1≤hMS≤10
5≤W≤50
5≤h≤50

(Note 2)



PL1=20log10(40πd3Dfc/3)+min0.03h1.72, 10log10d- min0.044h1.72, 14.77+0.002dlog10h

σSF=4




PL2=PL1dBP+40log10ddBP

σSF=6



NLOS

PLSMa-NLOS=161.04-7.1log10W+7.5log10h-24.37-3.7hhBS2log10hBS+(43.42-3.1log10hBS)(log10d-3)+20log10fc-(3.2log1011.75hMS2-4.97)

σSF=8


Rural Maro (RMa)

LOS

PLRMa-LOS= PL1, 10 m≤d≤dBP'PL2, dBP'≤d≤10 km , (see Note 2)


hBS=35
hMS=1.5
W=20
h=5

10≤hBS≤150
1≤hMS≤10
5≤W≤50
5≤h≤50



PL1=20log10(40πdfc/3)+min0.03h1.72, 10log10d- min0.044h1.72, 14.77+0.002dlog10h

σSF=4




PL2=PL1dBP+40log10ddBP

σSF=6



NLOS

PLRMa-NLOS=161.04-7.1log10W+7.5log10h-24.37-3.7hhBS2log10hBS+(43.42-3.1log10hBS)(log10d-3)+20log10fc-(3.2log1011.75hMS2-4.97)

for 10≤d≤5 km

σSF=8



Note 1:
Breakpoint distance dBP'=4hBS'hMS'fc/c, where fc is the centre frequency in Hz, c=3×108 m/s is the propagation velocity in free space, and hBS' and hMS' are the effective antenna heights at the BS and the MS, respectively. The effective antenna heights hBS' and hMS' are computed as follows: hBS'=hBS-hE, hMS'=hMS-hE, where hBS and hMS are the actual antenna heights, and hE is the effective environment height assumed to be hE=1 m.

Note 2:
Break point distance dBP=2πhBShMSfc/c, where fc is the centre frequency in Hz, c=3×108 m/s is the propagation velocity in free space, and hBS and hMS are the antenna heights at the BS and the MS, respectively.

...

hBS=maxhTx, hRx
hMS=minhTx, hRx
Anchor_Ref529442393_Ref529442393


Table 2: LOS Probability

Scenario

LOS probability

UMa

PLOS=min18d, 1⋅1-exp-d63+exp-d63

SMa

PLOS

Mathinline
body--uriencoded--P_%7BLOS%7D=\min%7B\left(\frac%7B18%7D%7Bd%7D,\ 1\right)%7D\cdot\left(1-\exp%7B\left(-\frac%7Bd%7D%7B63%7D\right)%7D\right)%7B+%7D\exp%7B\left(-\frac%7Bd%7D%7B63%7D\right)%7D

SMa

Mathinline
body--uriencoded--P_%7BLOS%7D=1, d≤10exp-d-10200,d>10

Mathblock
P_{LOS}=1, d<10
exp-d-10200,d>10  


RMa

PLOS=1, d≤10exp-d-101000, d>10

...


Note:

...

According

...

to

...

Report

...

ITU-R

...

M.2135-1,

...

the

...

LOS

...

probabilities

...

are

...

used

...

only

...

for

...

system

...

level

...

simulations.


In case the LOS probability is used, the path loss is computed as follows:

...


The input parameters for the path loss model ITU-R M.2135-1 are shown in Figure 1 and defined in Table 3.

Anchor_Ref507762590_Ref507762590
Figure 1: GUI of the ITU-R M.2135-1 path loss model
Anchor_Ref507762636_Ref507762636


Table 3: Parameters of the ITU-R M.2135-1 path loss model

Description

Symbol

Type

Unit

Comments

Variation

σSF

B

dB

Variation in path loss (applies shadow fading)

Scenario

-

S

-

Urban Macro Cell (UMa), Suburban Macro Cell (SMa) or Rural Macro Cell (RMa)

Line of Sight

-

S

-

Line of Sight (LOS), Non-Line of Sight (NLOS), or LOS Probabilities

Street width

W

D

m

Average street width

Building height

h

D

m

Average building height

...

[1]

ITU-R, "Report ITU-R M.2135-1: Guidelines for evaluation of radio interface technologies for IMT-Advanced," 2009.

[2]

P. Kyösti, J. Meinilä, L. Hentilä, X. Zhao, T. Jämsä, C. Schneider, M. Narandzić, M. Milojević, A. Hong, J. Ylitalo, V.-M. Holappa, M. Alatossava, R. Bultitude, Y. d. Jong and T. Rautiainen, "IST-4-027756 WINNER II D1.1.2 V1.2 WINNER II Channel Models Part I: Channel Models," 2008.

[3]

M. K. Samimi, T. S. Rappaport and G. R. MacCartney, "Probabilistic omnidirectional path loss models for millimeter-wave outdoor communications," IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 357–360, 2015.