Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Anchor
A5.3
A5.3
ETSI defines the intermodulation response rejection as a measure of the capability of the receiver to receive a wanted modulated signal, without exceeding a given degradation due to the presence of two or more unwanted signals with a specific frequency relationship to the wanted signal frequency ‎[1618].

In SEAMCAT, it is called the intermodulation rejection, and in the presence of more than one interfering system applying its own frequency distribution, a theoretically unlimited number of intermodulation products exist, caused by the non-linearity of the VLR.  In practice, just the products close to the frequency of the VLR are of importance, of which the products of the so called 3rd order[1] are the most dominant and therefore considered by SEAMCAT. The frequency conditions for the intermodulation products of the 3rd order are

...

            

Mathinline
body${{f}_{0}}=2\times {{f}_{1}}\pm {{f}_{2}}$
   (Eq. 98)

with

                                      f_VLR-b/2≤f_0≤f_VLR+b/2              (Eq. 99)

...

  • b           : is the bandwidth of the VLR;
  • f_0        : the trialed frequency of the victim system;
  • f_1, f_2   : the trialed frequencies of pairs of interfering systems in case more than two systems are to be taken into account.

...


As an example consider a victim system with a desired signal at frequency f0, a channel separation Df and interfering signals Ei1 and Ei2  at frequencies f0+n∆f and f0+2n∆f, respectively. The receiver non-linearity produces an intermodulation product Eif of thirdorder at the frequency f0 as shown below in Figure 370.

...

372.

Unit
body{{f}_{0}}=2({{f}_{0}}+n\Delta f)-({{f}_{0}}+2n\Delta f)
  
Unit
bodyn=\pm 1,\pm 2,...
  (Eq. 100) 




Image Added

...

Anchor

...

F372

...

F372
Figure 370372: Illustration of intermodulation product Eif of third order at the frequency f0

 


The signal strength Eif of the intermodulation product is given by

                                                     Image Removed                     

                                     

Mathinline
body${{E}_{if}}=kE_{i1}^{2}{{E}_{i2}}$
    (Eq. 101)

 


with some constant k to be determined. For signal levels (measured in dB), Eif becomes  and the equation above reads


Image Added 

Image Removed                                             (Eq. 102)

 


From the measurement procedure which is described e.g. in the ETSI standard ETSI 300-113, clause 8.8, we can derive the calculation algorithm. The method is similar to the contribution for blocking interference. ETSI 300-113 defines via the intermodulation response Limr the interfering signal levels iRSSi1 = iRSSi2 at which bit errors due to intermodulation just start to be recorded.

Anchor
F373
F373
Figure 371373: Illustration of intermodulation product from ETSI 300-113

 


This means, for iRSSi1 and iRSSi2, we have an intermodulation product  relative to the noise floor (0 dB), due to the noise augmentation (N+I)/N of 3 dB corresponds to an I/N of 0 dB. Transferring Figure 371 into a formula gives the relation

                                    

           Image Removed         

      

Mathinline
body$0=2({{L}_{imr1}}+3dB+{{L}_{sens}})+({{L}_{imr2}}+3dB+{{L}_{sens}})+20\log k$
   (Eq. 103)

from which we can derive the calculation algorithm for this example

                           Image Modified

   

(Eq. 104)

 


where for interferer i-th, at frequency x:

                    (Eq. 105)

where

  • P^output_ILT      : power supplied to the ILT antenna (before power control);
  • g^PC_ILT          : power control gain for the ILT with the power control function,
    see ‎ANNEX 14:;
  • PL_ILT->VLR  : path loss between the interfering link transmitter i and the victim link receiver;
  • G_ILT->VLR    : ILT antenna gain in the direction of the VLR;
  • G_VLR->ILT    : VLR antenna gain in the direction of the ILT;
  • MCL         : Minimum coupling loss given by the system parameter definition.
 


For any other consistent combination of (N+I)/N and I/N this becomes

         (Eq. 106)

 


For the computation of the intermodulation products in the victim link receiver two different interfering systems (i-th and j-th) are required and the total intermodulation product is


Image Added   

Image Removed                   (Eq. 107)

where:

  • iRSS^(i,j)_intermod: intermodulation product at the frequency f0;
  •  LL_inter           : the attenuation given by the input parameter 'Intermodulation rejection'. This attenuation applies inside the bandwidth of the VLR. It is therefore advisable to set a constant value as intermodulation rejection;
  • L_sens            : the sensitivity of the VLR given by the system parameter definition;
  •    (N+I)/N           : Noise augmentation given by the system parameter definition;
  •    II/N              : interference to noise ratio given by the system parameter definition.
 


In case the intermodulation product does not fit the frequency condition  , a value of -1000 dBm is returned in SEAMCAT.

The EPP Demo9 (Figure 372374) allows you to see the behaviour of this equation.

Image Removed

 Image Added

Anchor
F374
F374
Figure 372374: EPP Demo 9 – intermodulation internals

 

 





[1] the order is given by the sum of the absolute values of the coefficients, here 2 + |1| = 3