Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Assuming that the received power is equal to the sensitivity of the victim link receiver, then the radius Rmax can be determined for the wanted radio path by the following equation.

 

                         (Eq. 163)

 

where the path loss is defined by a median loss plus an additional term representing the distribution

 

                                                                 (Eq. 164)

where:

 

  • Fmedian: propagation loss not including slow fading, i.e. path loss without variations option;
  • Fslowfading(X%): slow fading margin for X% coverage loss;

 

The distribution of  the path loss  can be expressed in a general way by the following equation:

                                                                                        

 

where  is the cumulative distribution for Rmax and the resulting mean path loss  and an additional path loss  due to availability or coverage  . The availability y of the system is linked to the coverage loss through the simple relation y = 1 – x. Assuming that slow fading can be approximated by log-normal distribution, i.e. median  mean, the relation  can be introduced where  stands for a multiple of the well known standard deviation . A few examples for illustration: At a 95 % coverage,  results in 1.96, for 99 % in 2.58, for 99.9 % in 3.29, or  68 % coverage, for  for 95.5 %. The exact values can be easily determined by using the inverse Gaussian function.

 

Then the equation:

                (Eq. 165)

 

The determination of the zero of function v, is made through a recursive method such as regula-falsi used in logarithmic scale which should yield a better precision. The solution of such a method provides:

                                    (Eq. 166)

 

In this case, formulas given for  have to be inverted.

 

Note 1: Inverse of the normalised Gaussian cumulative distribution is implemented through a piecewise approximation.

 

Note 2: Ro to be set to 1 m (0.001 km)

 

Note 3: If after running the simulation it appears that the resulting coverage radius is equal or very close to the minimum distance or the maximum distance used in calculation of coverage radius, it is likely that there is a mistake in the values you provided. This can be solved by reducing the minimum distance or increasing the minimum distance used in calculation, so that the algorithm may find the corresponding coverage radius.

 

Note 4: When setting the Rmin, Rmax values, please observe the validity range as appropriate for the selected propagation model. Otherwise SEAMCAT will produce the error message when starting a simulation.

  • No labels