Once SEAMCAT has completed the simulation, the results are shown as displayed in Figure 261, when the CDMA network is the victim. This figure presents the difference between the 2 steps power balancing process (1-initial power balancing, 2- power balancing after introduction of an external interference), that is to say " non-interfered capacity " is the number of UEs in the victim network prior to adding an external interferer and "interfered capacity" is the number of UE in the victim network after adding the external interference.


When the CDMA system is the interfering link, the total received power at the receiver in the victim link, due to the transmit power of all the active mobile stations in the three cells of the center cell site of the CDMA cluster, adjusted for spectral masks, etc., is counted as the interfering power in the victim link.  Therefore, it is not necessary to keep track of any capacity loss in this case, unless the victim link is also a CDMA system.

Figure 261: Example of the CDMA results display panel


Figure 262: Example of the CDMA results display panel


SEAMCAT is able to calculate (for CDMA) 3 losses:

1)     Loss of UEs for the whole network based on the before and after number of UE


System capacity loss = 100 - (interfered_capacity/ non-interfered_capacity)*100              (Eq. 70)


2)     Loss of UEs for the reference cell based on the before and after number of UE

Ref cell capacity loss = 100 - (interfered_capacity/ non-interfered_capacity)*100              (Eq. 71)


3)     Loss of UEs for the whole network based on the total number of dropped UE

System capacity loss = total_dropped_UE_system/total_simulated_UE*100                    (Eq. 72)


It is quite important to understand that there is not a 1-to-1 map between non-interfered active/interfered users and the dropped users. Dropped user can occurs at many level of the algorithm, it can be due to: